Global Warming File
NASA data suggests yes.
They grow up and become carbon abusers. So, according a philosophy professor at a prestigious university, we shouldn’t have them any more.
Why are Bernie and Hillary so opposed to fracking? It’s great for the environment. Even the EPA calls it safe.
That’s worth it, right? Spend trillions to get nothing but more poverty and suffering in return.
Should help out the Pacific Coast drought. Somebody should share the news with the global warming crowd in Paris.
Here’s a take that’s gathering some traction.
That people on the Left from the President on down assert this “97% of scientists” line as if it came from Sinai is a scandal in and of itself.
This article runs through ($) all the various claims. Here’s a survey you’ve probably never heard of: “Surveys of meteorologists repeatedly find a majority oppose the alleged consensus. Only 39.5% of 1,854 American Meteorological Society members who responded to a survey in 2012 said man-made global warming is dangerous.”
Tunnel into this, as the author does, and you’ll see what a piece of shameful hocus pocus it is.
By the end of her second term. Really? How? But here’s the bigger question: why? Fossil fuel is cheap and reliable. Green energy is expensive and unreliable.
Due to solar activity. Why is this prediction less valid than global warming theory?
Doesn’t this kinda disprove the whole rising sea level thing. Maybe computer models aren’t that reliable. Maybe earth’s climate is too complex for comprehensive, flawless projections. Maybe.